The low-profile tires are a big drawback to the car as a daily driver. I've been reading NHTSA consumer complaints for the Fusion Sport and there are multiple complaints about tire damage from potholes. Ford under-sized the tires for this car. 235/40R19 might be fine for a 3000-3500 lb sedan, but on a 4120 lb Crown Vic sized vehicle (The Fusion Sport weighs as much as a 98-02 Crown Vic/Grand Marquis), it needs more sidewall. The MKZ has 245/45R18 (edited: standard size), which looks like a far better option for a vehicle of this weight, but I'd want more. The Taurus SHO is 4300 lb and comes with 255/45R19 stock with 245/45R20 as an option for the Perf Package but they then went to 245/45R20 across the SHOs. To my eye the 255/45R19 was still a thin tire, but I never had a problem driving in SE MI pothole ridden roads. Within 1 month, a single month, of driving the Fusion Sport around the winter, I lost 2 tires back to back due to pinch flats from potholes that wouldn't have done a thing to normal tires.
If you don't daily drive this car and/or live in an area with fine smooth paved roads year-round, this shouldn't be a problem.
If I were you, I'd look for a MKZ AWD w/ the 3.0L EcoBoost. 2020 is the last year for this vehicle and factory orders were cut-off a few weeks ago. There is far more tuning potential from that 3.0L because of the bigger turbos they used (the 3.0 is based on the 2.7 in the Fusion Sport).
This is also why the Edge ST is woefully underpowered for its weight compared to the Explorer ST. I can get maybe 450 hp out of the tuned 2.7 EcoBoost, but that 3.0 in the Explorer ST can be tuned for 500-550 hp, shooting the 4800 lb. Explorer ST into the 12.0x 1/4 mile ET. The Edge ST looks sleeker and is less expensive, but the cost delta between the Edge ST and Explorer ST coupled with the power differences makes the Edge ST not worth looking at.
If I had to do it again, I would have gone with the MKZ 3.0 and spent a little more up front.